“....The truth is that the Government's revenue is collapsing.... the Government is getting into a bigger and bigger hole on public finances. And there simply isn't the money to afford concessions of this kind....”
Vince Cable, a UK MP, speaking in the BBC television on Wednesday 16 July 2008, about Alligator Darling’s postponement of a rise in fuel tax.
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole” CAMPAIGN says at 1010 GMT Thursday 17 July 2008: We agree with Vince Cable. Again! But what about Mr Cable’s alleged colleagues in the House of Commons Lib Dems group? Do THEY understand what Mr Cable has repeatedly shown he does about the UK Public finances? If they do then why is the Lib de,s’ latest ‘Transport spokesperson’ silent about the CRASSness of committing £Billions of public money to Crossrail hole? Is Isn’t that making the public finance HOLE the Govt is getting into even DEEPER? And is that a wise hole to dig and get dug in? Or are Vince Cables’ Lib Dems co-MPs, who are silent on the wastefulness and foolishness of public finance imprudence being shown by Gordon Brown in committing £Billions to Crossrail, silent because they have been, to put it in the word recently ‘devised and deployed about Keith Vaz’, promised ‘rewards’ or been already ‘rewarded’ on behalf of the Big Business via their lobby? [To be continued]
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Monday, July 14, 2008
Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole agenda" election Manifesto on Tower Hamlets Council....
The list of first target wards in the Tower Hamlets Borough will be published in the afternoon on Monday 14 July 2008
Saturday, July 12, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! is set to get active in Tower Hamlets Council elections, next! To stop Crossrail hole plot against the East End...
0615 GMT 0715 UKTime London Sunday 13 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot agenda …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That the Blairing cliques on the London local councils controlled in the name of the former Labour Party by operatives impersonating ‘local councils’ are doing damage to the very local communities in whose name they abuse their positions.What does that abuse mean? For the communities, for individuals, for families in the boroughs affected? And a great deal of disservice, it means bad service. Or no service. How do they do so? How do these get away with misleading the ‘local’ communities? One of the persistent ways that they do it is by ‘taking advantage’ of the absence of active councillors on the same councils. As KHOODEELAAR! has reported for the past 55 months since our campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London began [on 31 January 2004], the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has been IN A STATE OF POLITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC MORASS in terms of an ‘elected collection of councillors speaking out for and representing the local community’. That morass is getting even worse by the week… Things are so bad that there is now no ‘official opposition’ on Tower Hamlets Council. Why? Is it because the existing ‘elected councillors’ who belong to allegedly [indeed as alleged!!!] opposition parties all set to ‘defect’ to the controlling ‘grouping’? Not as such. NOT Yet. But there is no opposition. No political opposition… Was that foreseen before the last ‘election’ held in May 2006? KHOODEELAAR! had foreseen that. But the ‘politically active opposition parties who were fielding candidates allegedly against the controlling grouping’ did not want to see the truth. They were also culturally hostile to the idea of a real campaign. They preferred to pretend to be radical, opposition and so on while in fact CRAVING to be in ‘position’…. And the result is that there is no NO POSITION… Politically speaking, democratically speaking, even aesthetically, linguistically, conceptually speaking, there is no POSITION on anything from any alleged opposition… on the Tower Hopeless Council…..Which is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is now considering one strategy, that of supporting named candidates at the scheduled council election due next in 2010 …[To be continued]
Friday, July 11, 2008
Crossrail hole Bill 'draft'-'writer' Tony McNulty now 'writes' to do away with civil liberties in Britain....
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2045 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies belief…
[To be continued]
The anti-civil liberties programme promoter Tony McNulty was at the Crossraul hole Bill plotting Dft in 2004-2005
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 2105 Hrs GMT Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2105 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties 'minister' Tony McNulty?
the CONTEXT of this commentary is the role that Tony McNulty played in backing the Crossrail hole Bill that was drafted while he was a minster in the UK Department for Transport in 2004-2005. The KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the community against further deprivation and it is also the constitutional law campaign against violation of fundamental hum,an rights..... The evidence of the role that Tiny McNulty did play in backing the Crossrail hole plot assault on the community shows that he will also back the violation of other civil and constitutional al awl rights... By ALL accounts, his role so far has been to suppress and to deny civil liberties and this is why we are ruining this campaign of the current role that McNulty has been playing via legislation to make communities more deprived, poorer and alienated....
By©Muhammad Haque
2105 Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 July 2008
How closely linked to causing of criminal deprivation in inner cities is the anti-civil liberties ‘minister’ Tony McNulty?
Why is this question being asked?
The answer will be published in a series, starting with this one.
First segment of the answer is that McNulty is getting to a point where he will run out of the physical energy needed to repeat himself with any credibility on issues that require honesty and truthfulness beyond the ability of time-serving ministers in a Blaired regime.
McNulty has not ‘acquitted himself’ at all during his appearances today Friday 11 July 2008.
Neither on the matter of the results of the Haltemprice and Howden [East Yorkshire, England] by-election which has been won by David Davis [as announced by a BBC news channel early today when the BBC apparatus was manifestly sabotaged and or rigged in order to continue the BBC agenda of doing down David Davis on the issue of civil liberties]
By credibility, once again, I mean credibility as universally recognisable. Credibility as objectively defined and applicable.
Credibility as defined in effect in the key and the landmark judgements cited on issues of veracity, transparency and truthfulness by universally positively cited and citable jurists and commentators.
Credibility as based on reasonable and transparent evidence.
Tony McNulty has not demonstrated any of those.
And McNulty’s utterances on the current situation in the country, as he made those utterances via the BC and Channel 4 News [fronted this evening Friday 11 July 2008 by Krishnan Gurumurty who 'interviewed' McNulty] were lacking credibility in a big way.
What has ‘any’ of it to do with the role of parents, schools and so on?
Because that was what he was saying!
Yet on scrutiny, on examination of what he uttered apparently positively about the role of parents and schools and so on, it would appear that Tony McNulty would have backed the dissing of parents and schools if in the appropriate context THEY were to be presented before the Government as demanding Govt support.
Especially parents. And communities in which parents exist and survive. Exist and fail. Or succeed.
Here is the man who has been doing the rounds before any committee, any number of ‘state approved’ persons for any number of weeks now spouting out the need to deny people rights that have formed the core structure and framework of constitutionality as far as they have been associated with Britain.
No matter how blatantly these same have been violated by the racist British imperialists in Asia and Africa, the FACT remains that IN Britain, those values have been very hard won. Very hard fought for.
In the world generally and in the era of ‘post-British colonialism and of the new-western imperialism of which British empire revivalist’ are very actively engaged, ALL the crises that get anywhere near resolution do so by the parties agreeing to abide by some of the very same core values that I have referred to.
Those are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights in the late 1940s at the outset when the United Nations was being founded [upon the ashes of the League of Nations].
No matter what the thugs who often control the ‘power’ at the UNO that now exists, even those thugs have to recognise the UNO’s founding principles and values. Albeit in name. Even they know that without those values providing the foundation of the UNO, the world ‘order’ will indeed collapse.
McNulty has been unable to reconcile his role in attacking those core values with his career need to appear on these TV slots.
I shall of course discuss Jacque Smith’s absence from all these slots and forms in due course. I shall examine Jacque Smith’s role as I see it from the inner city East End of London, in series of pieces that I shall dedicate to her role in the context of her appearances of being a another happy face behind Harriet Harman….
Jacque Smith holds the office of Home Secretary at present.
It is the Home Department that Tony McNulty is installed as a minister in.
He is the minister that has been deployed to justify the current series of attacks on civil liberties, due process, constitutionality, human rights and basic entitlement to justice that Gordon Brown is being sued by undisclosed forces to mount.
The role that McNulty has been assigned or the role that McNulty has found for himself in the task of promoting the anti-freedom legislation is the closest one that could be found in any UK administration that has existed since Margaret Thatcher left office. This is the one that is the first one to be engaged in implementing what Margaret Thatcher meant by ‘there is no such thing as society’
McNulty and civil liberty society do not mix.
And McNulty’s every utterance, his every physically violating [or is he getting tired and tiring?] gesture against any questioning of his role, shows that the man may be ‘clever’ as an alleged PR front [see his laurels sung this week by PR WEEK] but he appears to have no common sense let alone conscientiousness.
Not in the quantity that he mist have if he is to be regarded with respect as a minister of ‘ the Crown’.
It may be OK for the PR industry to peddle McNulty as a professional. Even as a short-term success, as they see it.. But in the realm of sense, to speak of justice, to address the ills that the state creates in society and regimes pile up against people and where the task is to provide a just and fair remedies for the ills in society Tony McNulty cannot be rated a success.
This is worrying.
How anyone in control of putting McNulty forward as the face and as the ‘debater’ for Gordon Brown’s programmes defies believe…
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
